The core columns large faces at floors about 77 give about 25” large. http://wtcmodel.wikidot.com/nist-core-column-data
With 2x 1cm large welding, it gives 125cm2 surface par core columns, using 30gr/cm2 of RDX that makes 3.75kg/column. Let’s say they cut out 500 and 1000 rows; that make 3.75x16= 60kg for all.
Yes, I always used the lowest possible value to cripple the column - 4kg of hexogene.
The explosions are situated inside the building; the sound projection direction is horizontal toward exterior and has a large expansion area before getting out. The shortest distance to be heard is some 1000m. Also the explosions may be delayed with a small gap of some milliseconds to reduce the addition of pressure wave. All those facts contribute to the reduction of the noise.
Are you kidding me?
bla...bla...]exterior and has a large expansion area before getting out. The shortest distance to be heard is some 1000m.
I realize that, but you're wrong. The soundwaves don't behave that way and 60 kilos of RDX???? That big explosion would "rapture" the eardrums of everyone within that distance.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2nGtVURPlE
some 30kg@200m, and those blast happend within some 0,1s. Listen to the fra**ing echo!
And the blast wind from 60kg of explosives would push an allmighty cloud of debris and smoke out of the windows.
Forget shape charges, it’s a Steven Jones made disinfo to support his thermite theory.
So monroe's effect is a conspiracy theory invented by Steven E. Jones? All my various Gods.
Also the explosions may be delayed with a small gap of some milliseconds to reduce the addition of pressure wave.
I'm afraid that you have to fire your charges within 0,5s-1s and there's 15 of them. in other words It would still sound like a big bomb. The continuos roar is Hoffman's wet dream at best.
All those facts contribute to the reduction of the noise.
No, I'm afraid that the only factor contributing to the reduction of noise are your fingers in your ears and the blindfold on your eyes.
The core columns must be exploded in order to make the upper part fall by flipping eastward. Without that, even if all OOS floors collapse, the upper part should remain vertical.
That’s also consistent with the prior collapse of the WTC1 antenna.
People on this forum are no joke, deal with that.
I put a suitable 1 kg charge at each of the relevant columns = total 24 kg. POUFF - they go off
You could also try to tickle them with more succes.
total 24 kg, No big noise!
So I need another 240 charges to blow off and destroy WTC1!
Warning: C tantrum often leads to temper tantrum in adolescent individuals, good.
Nonsense free zone:
So, the dead weight of the core columns is absolutely unsufficient to cause the observed IB that means that we have agreed on the fact that majority of the bwoing was caused by the rotation of the heavy floorslab?
And, would there be any significant load transvered via the hattruss (if the columns were cut at 104th floor....) to the exterior?
The rotated floorslab would also make the exterior unsupported for several stories, right? (pancake theory). Would be the amount of unsupporting comparable to the sagging floors and the NIST model? Did NIST take the loss of support into account in their models? Or am I totaly off?
Is there any inward bowing generating mechanism for the south tower? Could it be achieved with the help of 104th floor cuts? If so, how?