We are all too familiar with the arguments that go: "too many people involved, too much to be done, too much to cover up", etc., on and on. So this should stand as a dramatic reminder
of what is, in fact possible:
Attorneys for RFK convicted killer Sirhan push 'second gunman' argument
http://us.cnn.com/2012/03/04/justice/ca ... ?hpt=hp_t3
1. Where it is verified that Sirhan fired two shots freely, before being subdued. His 8 shot pistol
fired 6 shots while his hand was pinned to a steam table.
2. Neither of his two shots hit RFK.
3. He was firing from some distance in front of RFK, who was not hit from the front at all.
4. RFK was shot from behind, from a position close enough to leave powder burns on him.
So then, given the above, how does he come to be charged and convicted of assassination of RFK?
(please tell me I've missed some important point(s) about this, since I haven't read much more than the above linked article about it).
Okay, but assuming these details from that article are true, there is absolutely no case for those who would claim that 9-11 presents insurmountable obstacles, to shaping public opinion, by "perpetrators" working from within.
I eagerly await all replies.