Chew on the following. One way around it all is present the masters of the universe with unparalleled power to do anything... They can MIHOP it and LIHOP it at the same time! And of course create all manner of confusion by the great 9/11 technical debate... which has not proofs of theories and hypotheses.
Evidence is non credible because it's all been (mis)handled, including the visual record. It all Truman show... with some Being There tossed in.
"Answer? They Get the Memo
by James Hufferd, Ph.D., Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization
Who sits at the top of the New World Order pyramid and is, thus, in command of the power ultimately behind all of the unrelenting turmoil and disorder that everyone, everywhere is now abundantly aware keeps happening and happening at an ever-accelerating clip, in a most unnatural and un-spontaneous way, since 2001, and by now in virtually every corner of the world? (And wouldn’t “the New World Disorder” be a much more fitting designation for what’s going on?
I had a conversation recently with a colleague about who was behind bringing about all of this awful stuff in a by now obviously coordinated fashion with earmark characteristics shared by various of its different growing number of events and manifestations. He said he thought it wasn’t exactly one overall guru puppet master, or even a few, but most likely a few hundred overlapping members in the topmost élite organizations with at least a for-generally-known public face, obvious examples being the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg . . .
I told him I thought all of those were prominently involved, close to the top of the pyramid, but shard that the Bilderberg group, with fluid membership based on annual invitation to its conclave, was, according to sparse reports from inside it, expressly instructed to discuss, but not to hotly debate or contest any measures brought forth in its meetings if they hoped to ever get invited back. The implication being that initiatives would come down already decided from entities or bodies above.
And since there appears to be a remarkable cohesion and consistency (should I say carefully-measured relentlessness?) in the apparent agenda being foisted, albeit piecemeal, on the world, I told him I suspected that the overall direction, at least, and probably the directives themselves, were being send down from the summit for lower-echelon organs and uber-powerful operatives, to get carried out wherever and whenever and however might be indicated. And I suggested that the overall bold decisiveness and consistency of what’s kept happening, through by now numerous decades of policy and command, most certainly overlapping various and sundry U.S. presidencies, would indicate that there was, in fact, a world-scale “unitary executive” of some sort involved (to borrow possibly in-the-know prominent élite member Richard Cheney’s not coincidentally most apt term), quite securely occupying the very top, prime source position.
And that admittedly hypothetical “unitary executive” (or politburo), I conjectured, must consist of a tight group of select intimate individuals, few enough in number to relax around an ordinary conference table – a sort of board of trustees, with, presumably, one clear, likely hereditary leader. I say “likely hereditary” because the staged, multi-sectoral policy of its global program seems so coherent and consistent over multiple decades (though not always highly-successful or well-calibrated result-wise), with no evidence I know of of disruptive internal kerfuffles or reversals at the top of the order.
Surely, there must be a Nazi-Zionist caste and plot to all of this? you object. Well, the main shared attribute of the top of the pyramid is commonly known to be money. And who has and wields more than the lion’s share of the world’s wealth? The leading central bankers, who tend to be, by origin, N___-Z______s. My nomination for the likely identity of the chairman (unitary executive) of the world? The most apt and commanding member currently of the old-line Rothschild clan. (They are real people, after all, and true super-titans via endless re-compounding interest and acumen early on, so it’s logical, though not definite. It’s hard to guess who else would be so uncontested in such a position).
A more vexing question may be, how do they pull it off – their more-than-substantial global-scale control? Loans and interest rates, firm ensconce-ment as the longtime virtually lone source of fluid mega-capital to all of the now bankrupt sell-out governments (the “strongest” of which, note, plop resounding for Israel). And they wield similar control increasingly, through subsidiaries, of firms and individuals at all levels. Legions of compliant competitors for prime seats on the lifeboats of the obviously badly-misguided Titanic that is the world socioeconomic structure are given to know at all times which way the current is running and that they best not try to buck it, even in the slightest. And the way it runs they learn, above all, from the reliably compliant western media’s completely-servile reportage.
By comparison, very feeble and disorganized are the forces and individuals who would dare try to stem the prevailing tide on grounds of truth and public good, opposing the all-permeating, overpowering juggernaut.
One telling example to illustrate:
This year’s U.S. presidential contest seems extremely perverse and strange. My read is that “the powers-that-be” determined that Hillary Clinton, their ultimate “insider” member, her own value chamber emptied and refilled with their objectives, means, and scenarios – and, for good measure, totally owned by them in easy exchange for corruptly provided wealth, élite identity, and loud vocal, many-sided élite backing, is their designee (not candidate, designee). And for obvious reasons: she would, in fact, be them in the U.S. presidency. If (when) they want a war, speed-dial one up! If they want to subdue you and me through imposition of marshal law, due to the intransigence of some of us who resist their reasonable persuasion? Done! Legal “justification” will be found, or some rigamarole thrown together. Scuttle all progressive programs and bothersome pending legislation? They’re gone! All hands on deck = all seize-able funds to go toward warmongering, war buildup, war funding and materiel, planning, deployment, and testing new weapons, buying mercenaries and allies, planting more bases, systematically disappearing gigantic caches of money, more things like that! Did I mention stepped-up policing? All accomplished as favors owed.
Trump? He’s the consummate self-promoting blow-hard showman and contrarian, conveniently with a following already. He was flattered with all the unlimited and unrestricted free airtime he could conceivably fill on all the networks, month after month after month, to obliterate into obscurity by comparison all the other (dull) candidates, inevitably galling in the process all the still sane among us with his buffoonery and depravity. Why? Because he was the only conceivable opposing nominee even the daily-more-loathed arch-criminal HRC would likely look better than to people in most states, and so could be elected over.
But, reliably self-defeating though Donald Trump may indeed be, there still remains that faint hope among HRC’s gaggle of still certifiably-sane detractors that she might yet come off as even worse than Trump. If you can call that sort of forlorn pining “hope”. For, what would Trumpian domination of the U.S. government possibly look, sound, smell like? One thing we can know for sure: the NWO would not stand by idly for four or, O Lord, eight years.
So, what are Hillary’s more-recent and current crimes to which I refer? Well, they’re not crimes against the NWO code of conduct, that’s for sure, but against us. A top current one, in reality possibly the most serious, is election fraud. Apparent voting-machine hacking and tampering to reverse the tally in about a dozen key states in order to steal the Democratic nomination. Commendable (because it worked) in the eyes of the NWO – which disdains democracy in any form. A second, how about murder for hire? Multiple murder for hire? The mainstream media never once dares mention the lawsuit competently mounted, with convincing, hard evidence, against Clinton and the DNC for the felony of election fraud. When Trump parrots some of the progressive Democrats raising and supporting the lawsuit, including other serious election infringements as well as voting machine tampering, largely revealed objectively, among multiple other things, by recent Wikileaks dumps of not-previously-disclosed emails, no less than the President is trotted out to roundly and jeeringly ridicule Trump’s very reasonable deduction that the November election might likewise be “rigged” as some sort of new wild, baseless “conspiracy theory” (completely overlooking stark, election-reversing examples in point from 2000, 2004, and 2016).
So, then, what about the five recent murders (or phenomenally timely, unlikely “suicides”) of fit individuals about to testify against HRC or connected closely with the Clinton Foundation, the DNC, and/or the Clinton campaign? Are those dire new allegations of “just too handy and suspicious” deaths to-be-routine really so frivolous, I wondered, that neither would the FBI take note, the media report a word of their suspicious circumstances, or responsible parties ever even bother to get involved? That is, until today. Today, obviously wondering similarly, Julian Assange, the renowned founder of Wikileaks, and purveyor of all the leaked Clinton and DMC “deleted” emails, has also offered a reward of $20,000 to anyone who can materially solve the latest of the murders, that of 27-year-old DMC programming operative, Seth Rich, who was reportedly to testify later in the week in which he was shot in the back in a “botched robbery” at 4 a.m. in DC.
And so, the question now arises as more than a hypothetical: would the public still support an indicted murder-arranger or willing accomplice over the brash and crude Mr. Trump? (Or alternatively, for some, can obviously-hacked voting machines stop a rebelling and revolting U.S. public?)