The 9/11 Forum

Intelligent and evidence-based discussion of 9/11 issues

Skip to content

v

Welcome
Welcome!

Our vision is to provide a home to sincere 9/11 researchers free from biased moderation and abusive tirades from other members.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which only gives you access to view the discussions. New registration has been temporarily enabled; take advantage of it!

Search found 2801 matches

Return to advanced search

Re: Washington Post Conspiracy Theory: Russian Fake News

If there is one thing we learned, the intelligence community doesn't like Russia Today. Another thing that can be learned is that neither the Bush administration nor Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration have the slightest problem promoting conspiracy theories if it suits their agenda. They ...
by Major_Tom
on Wed Jan 18, 2017 6:56 pm
 
Forum: Post 9/11 Politics
Topic: Washington Post Conspiracy Theory: Russian Fake News
Replies: 43
Views: 1460

Re: Washington Post Conspiracy Theory: Russian Fake News

stundie wrote:Its been a funny few weeks in the news hasn't it...



It would read like a comedy if the organizations involved didn't have a long history and much experience in propaganda techniques, power grabs, and egging on extreme large scale violence which can go on for decades.
by Major_Tom
on Wed Jan 18, 2017 6:41 pm
 
Forum: Post 9/11 Politics
Topic: Washington Post Conspiracy Theory: Russian Fake News
Replies: 43
Views: 1460

Re: Washington Post Conspiracy Theory: Russian Fake News

This particular conspiracy theory is on the verge of creating a constitutional crisis. From the consortium news website (listed as a "useful idiot" Russian stooge website): President-elect Trump said a few days ago that his team will have a “full report on hacking within 90 days.” Whatever...
by Major_Tom
on Wed Jan 18, 2017 6:35 pm
 
Forum: Post 9/11 Politics
Topic: Washington Post Conspiracy Theory: Russian Fake News
Replies: 43
Views: 1460

Re: History of the 9/11 Forum

A second experiment was conducted in the same way in the same forum for the same purpose. This time the topic covered the collapse progression processes of WTC1 and 2. The original thread and the resulting branches are here: OOS Collapse Model and this thread and OOS Collapse Model II Results of the...
by Major_Tom
on Fri Dec 23, 2016 8:23 pm
 
Forum: Other Issues
Topic: History of the 9/11 Forum
Replies: 34
Views: 1085

Re: History of the 9/11 Forum

The period of entrenchment: Testing the external environment What do I mean by 'entrenchment'? I can show anyone who wishes to see what I mean simply by presenting some of the results of the work done within this forum from 2009 to 2011 to different audiences outside of the forum. I have done some ...
by Major_Tom
on Fri Dec 23, 2016 1:50 pm
 
Forum: Other Issues
Topic: History of the 9/11 Forum
Replies: 34
Views: 1085

Re: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?

I know M_T's preference to artificially limit what he accepts as "evidence" strictly to the visual record. We've been through this in 2011 already, if memory serves. That was the false start of his JREF thread that got moved to the Science sub-forum. The thread was actually part of an exp...
by Major_Tom
on Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:24 pm
 
Forum: Leadership and Group Dynamics
Topic: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?
Replies: 561
Views: 6782

Re: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?

So we have found a perfect topic for a debate between us: The statement (thesis) within the quote of mine above. When do you want to begin? What's to debate? I agreed with the statement. Good. The thesis stated once again: There is no fact-based technical account of the World Trade Center collapses...
by Major_Tom
on Tue Dec 20, 2016 5:36 pm
 
Forum: Leadership and Group Dynamics
Topic: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?
Replies: 561
Views: 6782

Re: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?

My statement (thesis): There is no fact-based technical account of the World Trade Center collapses. This is verifiably true beyond doubt. The true collapse modes of the Twin Towers are not accurately determined within any academic, professional or government literature. . Let me try again. The abo...
by Major_Tom
on Fri Dec 16, 2016 1:41 am
 
Forum: Leadership and Group Dynamics
Topic: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?
Replies: 561
Views: 6782

Re: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?

My statement (thesis): There is no fact-based technical account of the World Trade Center collapses. This is verifiably true beyond doubt. The true collapse modes of the Twin Towers are not accurately determined within any academic, professional or government literature. DGM's reply: There can be a ...
by Major_Tom
on Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:21 pm
 
Forum: Leadership and Group Dynamics
Topic: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?
Replies: 561
Views: 6782

Re: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?

Are you saying that there is no need of a fact-based technical account of the World Trade Center collapses? Where did I say that? I simply said there is a limit to practical usability and interest. The orignal post to which you were responding: There is no fact-based technical account of the World ...
by Major_Tom
on Tue Dec 13, 2016 2:34 am
 
Forum: Leadership and Group Dynamics
Topic: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?
Replies: 561
Views: 6782

Re: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?

Are you saying that there is no need of a fact-based technical account of the World Trade Center collapses?
by Major_Tom
on Tue Dec 13, 2016 12:45 am
 
Forum: Leadership and Group Dynamics
Topic: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?
Replies: 561
Views: 6782

Re: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?

Direct measurements and observations extracted from the visual record of the collapses grossly contradict the written history of those events as it is generally presented. I have company and will not be able to respond to the entirety of your post tonight but, could you define what you consider to ...
by Major_Tom
on Mon Dec 12, 2016 7:46 pm
 
Forum: Leadership and Group Dynamics
Topic: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?
Replies: 561
Views: 6782

Re: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?

I tend to doubt you actually read any replies to your posts. In the opening posts of the "insignificant fringe" thread I quote OWE... To bring it around... This is why I ask, DGM, what are you NOT okay with? I don't want you to feel uncomfortable or put on the spot, only want to hear any ...
by Major_Tom
on Mon Dec 12, 2016 7:43 pm
 
Forum: Leadership and Group Dynamics
Topic: Is this forum becoming JREF-lite?
Replies: 561
Views: 6782

Re: Washington Post Conspiracy Theory: Russian Fake News

Seriously, as a CT, this is IMO way more nutty that most 9/11 CTs. Much crazier than Gage. Gage uses bad observations and measurements and wants a new investigation. That is not a war crime. Looking at the speakers in the clips within the Moyers documentary, they were totally blinded in their advoc...
by Major_Tom
on Mon Dec 12, 2016 7:31 pm
 
Forum: Post 9/11 Politics
Topic: Washington Post Conspiracy Theory: Russian Fake News
Replies: 43
Views: 1460

Re: Washington Post Conspiracy Theory: Russian Fake News

Seriously, as a CT, this is IMO way more nutty that most 9/11 CTs. And, like the WMD fantasy, it's a mainstream CT. But people keep focusing their attention on the insignificant fringe. This is a point I want to go into in more detail in this thread. A second source on press coverage leading up to ...
by Major_Tom
on Mon Dec 12, 2016 7:13 pm
 
Forum: Post 9/11 Politics
Topic: Washington Post Conspiracy Theory: Russian Fake News
Replies: 43
Views: 1460
Next



Return to advanced search

cron

suspicion-preferred