The 9/11 Forum

"MIT researchers have invented an algorithm which is able to amplify motion in video that is invisible to the naked eye — such as the motion of blood pulsing through a person's face, or the breathing of an infant. The algorithm — which was invented almost by accident — could find applications i...

So will Dwain Deets cover Major Tom's list of objections to AE911Truth talking points too? Will he credit this forum? I applaud promotion of ROOSD or at the very least a saner perspective on the WTC collapses but I implore all of you to also contemplate the social dynamics involved. Namely, that the...

Mind you, the beauty of producing information from data in the way it's being done here is the nuance and the intellectual integrity behind it, rather than aggressive, agenda driven evangelism. The key is the ability and the permission to be surprised and turned by your own research, regardless of p...

I see Major Tom doing hard, enlightening work describing, characterizing and helping others understand the WTC collapses from a technical, scientifically responsible perspective, while critiquing and mapping the irrational and emotional resistance to politically inconvenient facts. Moreover, he merc...

From AE911Truth's two hour slide show: (click to enlarge) http://www2.ae911truth.org/ppt_web/2hour/slides/jpg_960x720/Slide69.PNG.jpg Seems like the girder is resting inside a socket. Doesn't seem to me like it would just move sideways, should it expand, one would think it would bend and deform lik...

There might be a linear relation between the accuracy and resilience of data presented at JREF and the hostility it incurs. It drives them especially mad if the barrage of ad hominem doesn't have the desired effect of evoking a disqualifying temper tantrum on the part of the original poster. One has...

Do you believe that the praise of ******** like snowcrash will win you any fame? From this post Nice. I see it's another blind hatefest @ JREF. So much tunnel vision. They're looking through scopes, and when they see a civilian, they snipe. Collateral damage is preferred over accidentally overlooki...

Thanks for the comments, Oystein. I knew you'd make a good example. Me too. And the obligatory "truther unmasking" is a telltale, and quite unappetizing JREF ritual which was endlessly tried on Femr2, in other to justify guilt by association attacks, and the beloved "if it wasn't an ...

Doesn't the photo show the girder physically constrained? I'm not seeing that in the simulation. Seems relevant?

So the majority of people who were banished were trollish truthers, but since that data doesn't fit tfk's bias, it's thrown out. Tfk needs his accusations to be true so they can reflect on his own bloated self-perception. Maybe tfk isn't omniscient, omnipotent. Maybe he's fallible. An insufferable p...

MT, I have no disagreements with your exposition of the prevalent false dichotomy at all. In fact, my intent was to add to it. Yeah I do think that proving NIST wrong doesn't necessarily prove CD, this is what I've coined "falsification-speculation" or "falsiculation". Yet, in la...

What? Why? You? What, is there some jackass moderator with a personal vendetta against you? (Not that I wouldn't know anything about that, heh). OWE didn't describe the post as inflammatory, but if I click the link I'm presented with a login screen, so it's clearly been "quarantined", yes.

SanderO, since the West penthouse collapse is occurring nearly simultaneously with global progressive collapse, what held it up if all that was left was curtain wall? Mind you there were cooling towers too. What held them up? Did they collapse inconspicuously behind the louvers? These are some of th...

A couple of quotes from Christopher7 at JREF recently: FEMR is a lot of noise. He has no credentials and no credibility at all. He claims to know better than the "experts" at NIST and a teacher with two masters degrees. Only the fanatically faithful believe this anonymous blowhard over pe...

Once again, note how talking points defending the NIST reports as the ultimate statement in the WTC collapses I find your point here intriguing, and yes, phrasing the problem as if proving NIST wrong proves CD is a logical failure. But... what proving NIST wrong does do, is force the "skeptic&...