The 9/11 Forum

OneWhiteEye wrote:there were a number of rate-your-professor sites out there which had a page on him.

Yikes.

Ouch. They have him to a "T"

Could you translate that.... Shouldn't need it, but sure... Where was the impact? at the roof line? As I said, yeah, think so. Video would tend to correlate such. Doesn't this mean something fell from ABOVE the roof line? What would that be? Parts of the plane or parts of WTC 1? As I said, parts of...

What are plausible explanations? It is highly likely that the gouge was caused by impact from perimeter sections from the descent of WTC1. It can be seen that damage at the roofline extends wider than that further down, so I would suggest a small scale casscade failure from impact region down to gr...

SanderO wrote:Is it possible that the dark is some severe staining from smoke which originated from the lowest level.. and rose straight up?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfhA_XsYUbk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaoXMx4pSFE

Damage is certainly present.

MrKoenig wrote:Column 20 is still in place, no?

Hmm. It would seem so. Such a long time ago that I last looked there in any detail...

How much tilt more or less, when and which direction? Difficult to put limits on it, as things become obscured by smoke and dust, but... At least 8 degrees by the time dust becomes a problem...and it's obviously not going to stop. As has been discussed in depth, there's very little tilt before the ...

this comment: Here it is shown that the velocity drop must have been three orders of magnitudes smaller than the error of an amateur video, and thus undetectable. is false. All it shows is their ignorance of the quality research which has been done, and an academic attempt to cover ass. Yeah, saw t...

http://femr2.ucoz.com/_ph/6/2/491037926.gif http://femr2.ucoz.com/_ph/6/2/712194009.gif Decimated to show every 5th frame. Each frame is a bright frame of all frames (11 frames, 5 either side of "the" frame and the frame itself). ETA: And "therealdeal"...though my browser seems ...

OneWhiteEye wrote:It may have been every 5th point

It was. Still crap...especially as he didn't deinterlace the video.

I'll locate my frame averaging code from the piling system ang give it a whirl.

what's needed is a smear, not an average of discrete frames. A big long bright white blotch stretching longer with each and every frame. Sounds like a "bright frame", rather than average ;) Maxmimum intensity for each pixel over all 12 frames. I'll sort it out if you like...unless you get...

the third in the center - should NOT be included because that IS the actual frame Of course. My brain fart. No, the two frames on either side of "the" frame. Yeah, that's what I mean by adjacent. Adjacent to "the" frame. All clear :) We're all on the same page. I know the method...

In fact... A very illustrative video could be made, one where the Sauret video is processed through the same arithmetic as Tony did with his displacement-time data. I really don't have the time to mess with it, or do I? It would let the casual observer see directly with their own eyes how much the ...

When, dear Lord, when is someone going to come up with an argument that requires something new, something that isn't dismissed by linking to years-old stuff? Not yours, of course, but this mass impact problem was repeated to me the other day... Yo momma so fat, she sat on a rainbow and skittles pop...

oh dear tony...

Personally, I've nothing against using software for purposes it was never intended, so long as it works. I've read the docs and I'd be very wary of what it'e actually done to the data. Might compare to raw. Maybe. I once used an audio spectral analysis tool to examine stock price fluctuations, afte...