The 9/11 Forum

Intelligent and evidence-based discussion of 9/11 issues

Skip to content

v
Welcome
Welcome!

Our vision is to provide a home to sincere 9/11 researchers free from biased moderation and abusive tirades from other members.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which only gives you access to view the discussions. Feel free to register to request membership. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. All potential members will be subject to an interview via email and only sincere and responsible researchers will be approved. See the forum guidelines for more information.

AA77's bodies

All things Pentagon.

AA77's bodies

Postby ULTIMA on Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:10 am

I have a question about all the bodies from AA77 being found inside the bulding.

The official story states that all the passengers were moved to the back of the plane.

So if the back of the plane did not make it into the building then at least some if not all the bodies of the passengers should have been found outside the building.
ULTIMA
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:29 am

Re: AA77's bodies

Postby femr2 on Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:33 pm

ULTIMA wrote:if the back of the plane did not make it into the building

On what basis do you state the back of the plane did not make it into the building ?
With that premise we should have plenty of photographic evidence of the enourmous tail fin. We don't. We have a golf course. No tail fin.
femr2
 
Posts: 1010
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:08 am
Location: UK

Re: AA77's bodies

Postby ULTIMA on Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:44 pm

Well 2 reasons why their should have been bodies found outside the building. You are correct in the fact that there should also be evidence of the tail.

1. The evidence stated and shown by the official story of the main parts of plane only in the first rings of the building.

The nose of the plane is made of composite and would have been destroyed on impact, the rest of the cockpit is made of thin aluminum and woud not have made it far into the building.

2. A military witness near the building stated that a plane crashed into the building with the back of the plane sticking out, then an explosion came from inside the building and destroyed the back of the plane.

So if we believe the evidence and the witness, bodies should have been found outside the building and not in a pile inside. Aso there should be evidence of the tail.
ULTIMA
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:29 am

Re: AA77's bodies

Postby femr2 on Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:27 pm

As this is the first Pentagon/Flight 77 thread, do you want to open it to a broader list of questions, or limit specifically to the lack of bodies, external debris, missing tail fin, engines, ...?

I'm quite fond of this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnEpia9JpYE
femr2
 
Posts: 1010
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:08 am
Location: UK

Re: AA77's bodies

Postby ULTIMA on Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:35 am

Yes we can open it to broader aspects dealing with the Pentagon and AA77.

Like the sims that have been done to try to prove the official story but most of them do not use the real FDR data from AA77.
ULTIMA
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:29 am

Re: AA77's bodies

Postby iconoclast on Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:57 am



oh man that video was great, hahaha. thanks femr, that's a keeper.
iconoclast
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:36 pm




Return to Pentagon

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests