by ULTIMA on Sat Oct 31, 2009 10:44 pm
Well 2 reasons why their should have been bodies found outside the building. You are correct in the fact that there should also be evidence of the tail.
1. The evidence stated and shown by the official story of the main parts of plane only in the first rings of the building.
The nose of the plane is made of composite and would have been destroyed on impact, the rest of the cockpit is made of thin aluminum and woud not have made it far into the building.
2. A military witness near the building stated that a plane crashed into the building with the back of the plane sticking out, then an explosion came from inside the building and destroyed the back of the plane.
So if we believe the evidence and the witness, bodies should have been found outside the building and not in a pile inside. Aso there should be evidence of the tail.