Well, I don't have any credit, so it may be inappropriate to write any critic, but...
Some of the forum members argue against the view proposed by the active thermitic paper,
they argue that the measurements and observations from the paper aren't conclusive, because....
and then they start to attack the idea of thermite and thermite assisted collapse, but I have to ask you: can you offer a single example of material, which would react like the chips, in all of the experiments/measurements?
So far it seems that nobody from this forum can offer a reasonable explanation on the origin of the aluminium platelets and iron oxide nanoparticles, let alone any theory on how they were mixed on the silicon substrate in relatively proper ratio.....(....)
Yes, we shouldn't jump into conclusions, but the weight of the evidence clearly ...(...), as you know - you can't say that test doesn't meet your expectations
so the whole thing must be something different, when the other tests tell a different story ( the evidence is cumulative, because every measurement will deviate from expectations....if you treat the evidence as non-cumulative, you will not be able to positively detect anything..)
This is not science, this is forensic science
and investigation.WE can't be sure on 100%, yet we have to arrive at a conclusion, and don't pretend that you are undecided, everybody is, at least subconsciously decided.....
Blah, blah.....if it's not primer paint, than it must be from the electronics..!
If we assume that there were 100 000 electronic gadgets in WTC complex, that could contain the red chips, then it's clear that every item had to contain on average 10+g of these chips, that's horrific number! I can't imagine anything like that sitting in front of me.....
" the grey portion consists only of iron oxide, so that's a prove that the chips were blah.blah"
So, you can pretend that you are strictly scientific, but that doesn't count here. The inert part of the chip could serve in the manufacturing process, or it could speed up the reaction, many pyrolants and explosives have problems with homogenous structure, which slows down the speed of the reaction in the whole charge.It would not be such a loss to loose a "few" percents of the energetic content to get ten times quicker reaction with better effect on the steel, especially when you are dealing with tons of that material.....
" we have no theory on the use of thermite, so it isn't thermite, but some yet undiscovered substance full of nanoparticles, which does occur in buildings...."
Massive circular logic, of course cutting of the core columns from inside the elevator shafts is a good hypothesis/theory (depends on your belief
).I agree that the truss theory by Jim Hoffman is laughable....i.e. there is only one way the thermite could be used, so the quote above is pretty much nonsensical
Note: This post isn't intended to be an attack against anybody on this forum by any means, sorry if you feel it in any other way.