The 9/11 Forum

Ozeco

Your statement about judges chuckling as being beneath their dignity, or something to that effect, got me to thinking.

Just for the record I would like to say that I've watched my share of trials and even testified about aeronautical matters twice. I socialize with several of the local judges at the local pub. They are regular people, and they chuckle. Some of them are very good joke tellers, including the ribald jokes.

So your comment suggesting that I was somehow disrespecting the court, I was not. It is not disrespectful to think that Judge Chin might have chuckled at the conclusion of a proper trial showing his previous analysis--that she had no case-- to be basically valid. If I were a judge I would chuckle at my victory.

There is infrequently, a courageous judge, such as Victoria Roberts who ruled against the government last week in the Huttaree Militia case and dismissed a fraudulent indictment. There are not too many judges quite as devoted to justice as Judge Roberts, do the right thing in a 'land of the free' concept.

Heretic76 wrote:Yeah, and there are some fools who believe that a pair of hijackers would simultaneously change their altimeters to local pressure. Too funny!!!

Are fools and charlatans the same thing?

If they believe Cimino, yes.

If their source is Cimino, who habitually sources his own ass (RADALT, ACARS, etc. etc.), yes.

If you believe even ONE WORD of what Fetzer says, then yes, absolutely.

Do I see Cimino inserting a Youtube embed featuring Albert Stubblebine, the clown who thought he could kill goats by staring at them, in that article?

A proponent of psychic warfare, Stubblebine was involved in a U.S. Military project to create "a breed of 'super soldier'" who would "have the ability to become invisible at will and to walk through walls". Stubblebine reportedly attempted to walk through walls himself, without success.[3]

Veterans Today is a known outlet of preposterous disinformation, which may be why you chose to cloak your link there with Tinyurl. It couldn't be because the link was too long or because there wasn't any room for it in the OP.

Did we meet on ATS?

There is little doubt in my mind that this forum is being harmed by the presence of disruptive disinformation right now. It may have been some of us attending ATS that drew this here. I hope these attacks cease, but I know my hope is idle.

What is ATS?

I'm not here to attack or defend other persons. I come here to discuss ideas, not people so much.

What Cimino has done with this article is analyze and interpret facts that we already know from the aeronautical perspective. I particularly relate to that because I am in the aviation business and have an aeronautical perspective on the events of 11 September. Some years ago I watched the simulation of the FDR data, and had not noticed that both altimeters were set simultaneously by the claimed hijackers.

As a man who has gone through the same drill himself countless times, I find it amusing that both the hijackers would do this, at the same exact time, no less. It is comical, but it is yet more circumstantial evidence that the Official Conspiracy Theory is completely concocted out of thin air.

Why exactly you see data from the FDR as being disruptive disinformation would be an interesting discussion, probably off topic.