Our vision is to provide a home to sincere 9/11 researchers free from biased moderation and abusive tirades from other members.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which only gives you access to view the discussions. New registration has been suspended.
SanderO wrote:I would say that the over arching problem with the 911 truth movement is CONCLUSIONS and FAILURE TO DOCUMENT / REPORT THE OBSERVATIONS.
Any site which purports to study 911 must deal with the above plus the errors and oddities of the official account.
I would begin by stating all the mis statements which exist created by the media and the government officials (NIST, FEMA, 911 Commission etc.).
I would go on to examine the evidence claims of the OCT... such as how they determined who hijacked the planes and even how they know planes were hijacked and what planes actually hit the towers etc. Why the officials are withholding evidence using in many cases "national security" concerns as the reason... such a the release of the construction documents and logs for the WTC buildings.
I would also include a reference section about technical aspects of structure, mechanics, physics, engineering, aviation, forensic science, chemistry, video and image analysis, optics, and so forth.
I would have a section of unanswered questions... or questions which should be asked and answered or were and the answers were not credible in the OCT.
I would not present any theories or hypotheses about what happened.
SanderO wrote:The official story can be falsified... many parts of it. And there are many questions raised by the official account which need to be answered.
Details are what evidence is about.
An example would be the plane which hit the pentagon. Where are all the vids taken that day? Why are they not released? If they show the commercial flight claimed.. why not prove it with the videos?
Several researchers on this site have looked at the visual record and done a yeoman's job and sorting out SOME of what happened and this is in conflict with the OCT and much of the 911 Truth movement. All three can't be correct. So what we have is claims of science and what would be junk science.
Perhaps your site could present the claims and the science behind / supporting them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests