Our vision is to provide a home to sincere 9/11 researchers free from biased moderation and abusive tirades from other members.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which only gives you access to view the discussions. New registration has been temporarily enabled; take advantage of it!
peterene1 wrote:what are the chances that the hijacker would fly the plane into exactly perpendicular and horizontal vector?.....
NIST says that the plane hit 6°downwards and 13°towards the east face.
Why they did it? Either some idiot was put in charge of the plane tracking or they were shocked by the preciseness of the strike - 0°downwards 0°sideways
Please, give me your response.It would be nice to hear that at least somebody cares about the precollapse analysis.
Dr. G. wrote:The engines do not appear to impact the south face at the same instant.
Dr. G wrote:I believe the air conditioning exhaust ducts for the Twin Towers were on the mechanical floors.
Dr. G wrote:If I recall correctly, I do believe the WTC 2 impact footage in question was supposedly taken from a location in Battery Park many kms to the South of WTC 2. Trouble is, some truthers showed there would be a bunch of trees in the way of the shots taken from the alleged location. This has been a big issue with the no-planers, .... which raises the ugly question of the authenticity of any of the 9/11 TV coverage.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests