Our vision is to provide a home to sincere 9/11 researchers free from biased moderation and abusive tirades from other members.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which only gives you access to view the discussions. New registration has been suspended.
I cannot make a qualified statement regarding building demolition, but I do rely upon A&E911 and others to help me make an informed decision in that regard.
SanderO wrote:AE911T is a marketing operation not a professional association of technical experts. AE911T has done NO research inside the organization or sponsored any. It simply assembled what they deem *research* which supports their thesis of explosive controlled demolition in the classic *cherry picking* of (flawed) observations and presents them in their various dog and pony shows and DVDs.
SanderO wrote:I served on the board of AE911T and recommended to Gage that AE911T assemble a group of their engineer petition signers to model the structure of the the buildings, do and FEA and a building performance study to see how they could be brought down or collapse. He flat out refused to do this... saying it was unnecessary as they had the nano thermite smoking gun evidence.
SanderO wrote:I can't argue with Rob Balsamo about aviation or avionics or judge his statements because I not competent to.
SnowCrash wrote:Well, that would seem to be belied by the fact that David Chandler is a board member and still publishing research. Besides, Justin Keogh is constantly accumulating research and gathering FOIA data. One could say Richard's presentation, whatever you think of it, is a product of research.
SnowCrash wrote:...I was a member. SanderO was. What's wrong with our opinions?
I served on the board of AE911T ...
Oystein wrote:SnowCrash wrote:...I was a member. SanderO was. What's wrong with our opinions?
not going to distract you too much from your debate with Heretic, just a quick Q: Are you saying you and SanderO used to be members of AE911T? What does that mean, exactly? Did you sign the petition, but had your signature later deleted? Or participated actively in whatever capacity, but don't any longer?
Oystein wrote:You see I am looking closely at the membership development over there. Just trying to figure out how they manage the list of signers.
Much of the AE911T story was created by the anonymous Arabesque.
Lots of smoke and mirrors.
SnowCrash wrote:Oystein wrote:You see I am looking closely at the membership development over there. Just trying to figure out how they manage the list of signers.
The integrity of the petition list due to the constant barrage of attacks and pranksters was a constant cause of concern. They have an entire verification team composed of multiple sub teams which deals exclusively with the verification of petition signers.
Team leader is Nor Cal Truth (Brian Romanoff) from 911blogger.
Believe it or not, they all work extremely hard and sacrifice a whole lot. I know that doesn't jive with the general perception from JREF and elsewhere, but that's what I saw.
Besides, there are multiple infiltrators from the no plane camp and JREF inside the mailing list right now, so why ask me? They got past the process... Ask them.
SnowCrash wrote:Biggest skeptic on the team is Gregg Roberts, and he does provide healthy counterbalance.
Oystein wrote:Is he still on? Haven't read anything new from or about him in a while. I'd expect him to drop out soon. His work on Judy Woody is unsurpassed and among the most fun contributions fron the movement.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests